Please consider all of the following remarks, and all my remarks in general 'qualified' in a wide variety of ways, including the implicitly read 'in my model' embedded within each sentence. Also, I consider this an asynchronous blog and therefore assume that anyone reading this has chosen to do so and could certainly cease, or abstain from doing so at any moment.
I have several working assumptions about change and the supposed process of change. At least it seems so to me today.
• Change is already always occurring, except with reference to the whole itself, in or as a function of which some change can be considered to be occurring.
• There is an 'absolute' version of such a whole, but it is not sensible in a 'normal' way and cannot be constructed from what seem to be its parts, because such a whole does not actually have parts, per se. Such a whole can perhaps be intuited.
• We actively define, construct, and enact conditional 'wholes' that are not naturally given, but are part of the larger whole (or we participate in such)
• Such an enactment gives us the impression of change as something that happens with respect to something that is not changing, but this is a false impression, in most cases
• Our thoughts, actions, behaviors, emotions are a result of participation in the definition, construction and enactment of these apparent (not actual) points of stability (paradigms, mental models, social constructs, habits, patterns and the sources of patterns- patterns patterning)
• Sadly this may mean that change is also not occurring, except as a function of our own construction and enactment - this possibility may have many interesting consequences in terms of managing what we experience as conditional change. It also means that in a functional sense that seeing our part in this construction and the act of pattern recognition become important.
Millan
Consider two extreme cases of attention. One state is a state in which one's attention is so 'relaxed' that their is no distinction between anything. Dreamless sleep might be considered an example of this. The other is a state in which one's attention is a single point, which also means no real distinction between anything. The intent of such a single point is to eventually release, dissolve or eradicate that single point. Both of these states are practiced in various traditions, whether through ecstatic (to be outside of oneself) trance, or focused meditation, etc.
We tend to believe that we ourselves are consistent in some way over time.