One of the things that we noticed during our last faculty collaboration meeting of the quarter was that we are intolerant of talking about our successes. We will spend hours on "problem solving" but after 10 minutes of reviewing what "went right," we were saying, "Okay, what is the point of this meeting? Why are we talking about this?"
I also noticed my tendency to document my complaints, and not the celebrations.
Here is a record of some of both.
SUSTAIN Winter 2012 After Action Review
I also noticed my tendency to document my complaints, and not the celebrations.
Here is a record of some of both.
SUSTAIN Winter 2012 After Action Review
We taught something
about how to learn—“it’s as if they’ve been remediated about something that
happened them to earlier in their learning: you can see it in their affect, in
their engagement, in their energy level, in the way they relate to each other.”
We’ve created a
community that is on the edge of self-awareness—so they can act things on their
own and in their own behalf
Relationships really
have happened for students: they socialize with each other; they are using
their relationships to learn with; their self-presentation with faculty is
considerably different and more relaxed. Students taught each other.
We saw indications
that students’ desire to learn and integrate the subject matter into their
lives
Students report
feeling safe and faculty report seeing implications for student
learning/awakeness/investment
A place has been made
for introverted students to show contribution and investment
Students are connected
to projects and the people without external motivation.
The quality of courage
of the faculty seems high—Roger notes this in relationship to the teams he’s
worked with in the past.
It’s clear that
faculty need a feedback loop and so can enact their own courage more
completely.
Student self-organized
to collaborate.
Just because we didn’t
see [have access to] learning happening during the quarter (Linda’s story) didn’t mean it wasn’t
happening. By the end of the quarter, it appeared—surprisingly to us.
We recognize that we
are using a feminine model—nurturing, community-based, relational.
We see into each
other’s classes in a way that has not happened for us as faculty before. We’ve accomplished transparency and
vulnerability at a few different levels that allows for collaboration.
As a group we are shifting our conversation from
linear, problem-solving to something that is more collaborative and playful.
Writing students have
shown success in actually trying to say something and so.
Our commitments of
attention for the coming quarter’s design
How can we further
help students to experience integration across their coursework and their
projects?
How do we honor the
whole more completely?
[How can we come back
around to pete’s experience to reflect/debrief his physical illness and whether
it has connection to our group’s work?]
Initial plans
We’ll cross-attend
each other’s classes
Then once a month
we’ll attend one another’s classes
No comments:
Post a Comment