We administered this test to the SUSTAIN students after 1 quarter and a group of freshmen in physics after 1 quarter. The physics class consisted largely of engineering and science majors in their fall of their freshman experience. A word about the physics class. It was run in a team-based learning mode where students, for all intents and purposes, appeared to be thriving and engaged in the course work. The faculty member was more of a coach than a lecturer in this course, so we had expected the physics students to report a high value of the course.
Results: The SUSTAIN students reported higher scores on all scales relative to the physics students by about a standard deviation (that is considered a large "effect"). The differences were statitically significant for all categories except the Course Learning. (Statistical test: Multivariate Analysis of Variance, p=0.000 for all cases except CL - p=0.100)
P=Physics, S=SUSTAIN
What is this saying? It is saying that the SUSTAIN students self-reported a higher degree of Course Value, Personal Learning, and Behavioral Learning than students.
Here are the questions in the categories (students were asked to rate these based on "strongly agree" (4) "agree"(3), "disagree" (2), and "strongly disagree" (1) :
Course Valuing:
This course was a very
valuable learning experience for me
I consider this learning
experience as time and effort very well spent
This was not a meaningful
learning experience (reverse coded)
This course was a rewarding
learning experience
This was not an inspiring
course (reverse coded)
This was a constructive and
definitely helpful learning experience
I would like to take another
course like this one (reverse coded)
I would not recommend this
course to a friend
Taking the course made little
difference for me
Course Learning:
The course helped me to
acquire important basic knowledge
I can now relate to the
subject matter of the course from a wider perspective
I did not gain much
information in this course (reverse coded)
I am now better able to
conceptualize problems present in the course
My understanding of the
subject matter has not increased much (reverse coded)
The course helped me achieve
a deeper understanding of the field
This course did not help me
gain thorough knowledge of the field (reverse coded)
I have not been able to tie
things together and make much sense of the content presented (reverse coded)
Personal Learning:
This learning experience
helped me to become more aware of my own feelings and actions
This course had no impact on
my personal growth (reverse coded)
This experience helped me to
realize the importance of my own feelings
I understand better how
others perceive me
In some ways I feel good
about myself due to this course
This course had no impact on
my understanding of who I am or what I want (reverse coded)
Some of my values have been
clarified due to this learning experience
I think I have learned to be
more tolerant
Behavioral Learning
This course had no impact on
the ways in which I communicate (reverse coded)
In this course I had not
developed my own learning goals (reverse coded)
Somehow I worked harder in
this course than I usually do
This course was useful in
helping me develop new ways of learning
Somehow I was more open and
sharing
I participated in this course
less than I usually do (reverse coded)
Somehow I have taken more
risks in this course, and I feel good about it.
I did no more reading or
thinking than was actually expected (reverse coded)
In this course I have taken
more responsibility for my own learning than I usually do
Very interesting. At some level this helps explain some of the interesting trends you saw with the communications course and students bringing controversial and very personal topics to the table. It makes you ask questions about what is "fundamental" to engineering education...we label our engineering science courses as fundamentals - but I would argue that this project pushes on that idea - that perhaps fundamentals are about situating the practice in real work that matters to people.
ReplyDelete