Creating social fabric

I just read this in a book by Peter Block, "Community: The structure of belonging," (Berret-Kohler Publishers, San Francisco) and recognized it as the process we're in:

"The social fabric of community is formed from an expanding shared sense of belonging. It is shaped by the idea that only when we are connected and care for the well-being of the whole that a civil and democratic society is created...what makes community building so complex is that it occurs in an infinite number of small steps, sometimes in quiet moments that we notice out of the corner of our eye. It calls for us to treat as important many things that we thought were incidental...If the artist is one who captures the nuance of experience, then this is whom each of must become. The need to see through the eyes of the artist reflects the intimate nature of community, even if it is occurring among large groups of people.
     The key to creating or transforming community, then, is to see the power in the small but important elements of being with others. The shift we seek needs to be embodied in each invitation we make, each relationship we encounter, and each meeting we attend.  For at the most operational and practical level, after all the thinking about policy, strategy mission, and milestones, it gets down to this: How are we going to be when we gather together?
     What this means is that theory devolves down to these everyday questions out of which community is actually lived: Whom do I chose to invite into the room? What is the conversations that I both become and engage in with those people? And when there are more than two of us together at the same time, how do we create a communal structure that moves the action forward?
     It is in these kinds of questions that accountability is chosen and care for the well-being of the whole is embodied.  Individual transformation is not the point; weaving and strengthening the fabric of community is a collective effort and starts from a shift in our mindset about our connectedness."

Making progress

We had a really great meeting today with the faculty collaboration. Roger helped us use the "sticky wall" to try to solve the puzzle involving.....

Course and projects
Projects and Topics
Students and Projects
Faculty and Topics
etc.......

After a lot of discussion we looked at a ridiculous project of "playing basketball for 2 hours a week" to see if even such a seemingly meaningless project could incorporate the topics from our course. A bit of a disclaimer in case someone misunderstands this example. We want to have students working on meaningful community based projects like described on our SUSTAIN SLO blog, and we are not saying Basketball is meaningless. This is just an illustration.

We all became energized around this. Below are some really great contextual examples around basketball.

Physics - acceleration, motion, collision of elastic and non-elastic objects.
Math - varying rates of movement. Balls traveling in a parabola. Maximum and minimum points using derivatives
Statistics - Free throw percentages, is there such a thing as a "hot" shooter? Probability of making a shot from different points on the floor.
Economics - Diminishing marginal returns, opportunity cost, consumer choice model, institutionalization of basketball, wage comparisons
English composition - Anything mentioned in economics can be formed into an argument, Analyze the voice, Analyze trash talk.
Communications - verbal and non-verabl communications, strategy of movement
Audience analysis, who sits where and why (i.e. Jack Nicholson)

Next week we will discuss various models of illustrating the interplay between course, students, time, projects, faculty, and anything else that matters. There are many ways to look at this, a request was made of the group in general to bring your favorite model to share.

I think we are making progress.

Capturing the process of collaboration

I've been thinking that I want to capture what it is like to collaborate with the faculty group. So far, we are faculty from English (2 women), Agribusiness (1 man), Physics (2 men), Engineering (2 women, 1 man), Biology (1 man), Economics (1 man), Communications (1 woman), Math (1 woman), Statistics (1 man). There is a woman from soil science and a man from history who have not been able to participate.

Ha. I've just finished typing this and I notice that I've separated people into disciplinary categories, making that the most prominent feature...I suspect doing this is a symptom of the disease of being an academic: we divide the world that way.

First, it is so refreshing to sit down with colleagues and think together.

There is something about their eyes...

I know this is going to be an odd entry, but I want to record it, maybe to free others to say some "unsayable" things about teaching.

Last week we had our annual department banquet where it is a tradition for students and faculty to perform skits. These are usually hilarious caricatures of our "selves." The students see so much more than we imagine. One has to laugh.

I am rarely confident that I have given or have anything to give to the students in my "teaching."  At this banquet, I was visiting with a group of about 8 of them and one volunteered that the class I wrote about in the blogs below was the best class they've ever taken.  I have to be fair...he may have been ever so slightly  intoxicated....I'm not entirely sure it is true in any way for them, but I'm reporting what happened. The others immediately joined in with enthusiastic agreement. In thanking them, I caught the eyes of one young lady who had GREAT difficulty in the class because of the dynamic of her group. I spoke with her group with honest ( but kind ) assessments of how I felt they were capable of more. I thought for sure she would report that it was the worst class experience of her life. She occurs to me as "hard bitten." But in her eyes was a humble sincerity that reminded me of the privilege of "teaching."

I am finding that in teaching in this new way,  I am seeing something in their eyes.  Perhaps I am seeing them and before I was too distracted by my self.  The meeting of that something in their eyes occurs to me as mystical and "otherworldly." I feel very humbled by this experience, because I can feel the place of honor in their lives.

I hope I can carry it responsibly.

Osmotic learning?

I have completed the experiment with my junior-level engineering course. It was a project-based course ("canned" project, invented by my teaching partner and me) that constituted 50% of the students' course load this quarter. We did not lecture at all, but loaded all the foundational content onto MOODLE. I implemented a series of self-quizzes that they could complete on their own. They had 3 chances to pass the quizzes without penalty. We told the students that the material supported their project learning, and gave them the entire quarter to complete it. There was a GREAT deal of autonomy in the course; students were largely allowed to manage themselves each class period after about 15-20 minutes of checking-in and managing logistics. My colleague and I presented ourselves as coaches to the work.

This is what I found: I was able to monitor students' access to the material. They were quite active on the quizzes during the first 3-4 weeks of the quarter, after which their attention naturally shifted to their team projects. It made me nervous that students were not (apparently) mastering the content, but I could see that they were engaged in the projects more significantly than we faculty have ever witnessed (my colleagues has 5 years of teaching this course...this is my second).  The projects also illustrated a creativity that we have not seen before--in previous years, most students defaulted to some kind of mechanical test.  This year, students did things like create a scaled up,  rapid-prototyped model of a cochlea with a simulated cochlear implant surgery.

 I was nervous that I had no indicators of individual learning (test scores).  I noticed my tendency to want to say this aloud to this class of 50+ students. But I refrained because I could see that I was managing to my own fear of something insufficient about their learning or my teaching. Every 2 weeks or so, I gave them some statistics on the quiz completion rates just to feed back information--there was no pressure to do anything different, only information about the status of the class's investment in the quizzes.

By the end of the quarter, all students completed the individual "quizzes" with a 84-100% "correct." The projects that were completed reflected group effort, so I cannot speak to individual contributions. (Again, I am nervous about this, because I somehow feel that my job as a faculty member is something about "quality assurance" of student learning--I need to think about this).

With the exception of 1 in 12, the projects represented a depth of integration of science, math, social factors that I have never seen before in junior-level students. I was truly amazed and could see that students had integrated some of the foundational knowledge that they "gained" through the quizzes. I would like to conclude that there is something about the way we did the course that contributed to their apparent learning success. It may be simply that we have a very unusual batch of students. I can't deny that as freshmen, they showed signs of greatness.

My comment about osmosis...I do worry about the quiet students, the about 20 students who so silently worked...what did they learn?  Can learning happen by osmosis?  Does it really matter? In the project-based learning that I have been doing (sometimes badly) in the past 8 years, this is my persistent question...are individuals learning what they need to learn?

Transparently inadequate

I have started about 5 posts…none deemed good enough for publication. Then I ask, what does “good enough” mean anyway? This one is for sure not “good enough” for publication.

I want to write about two related (unrelated) issues. First, it is my desire to live a congruent, transparent life, but I am so far from that aspiration. Secondly, I often feel as though I am falling short.

I am going through some chaotic issues in my own life. At some level I want to share these with everyone, I want to be heard, yet at another level the possibility or being misunderstood, or judged, keeps me from being 100% open. What does a transparent life look like?

Related to this, these chaotic issues are probably affect my teaching and participation in other activities. I am slow at grading and getting students feedback; I always have a long list of “to do’s” for my committee work and joint research. I could blame these shortcomings on my chaotic life, or I could just say that I am completely incompetent. The reason isn’t really the point. The point is that I feel as though I am often falling short. Does everyone feel this? Is it a feminine characteristic?

the illusion of "working"

Our learning experiment began at our institution in a rather unintentionally high-profile way. So I am not surprised when I run into people on campus and they ask me how it is going.

It is going a lot like that Zen story about the farmer. The story is that a farmer's horse runs away. His neighbors say "Oh, bad luck." He says, "Maybe." The horse then returns, bringing with it another horse.  His neighbors say, "Oh, good luck!"  He says, "Maybe." The farmer's son decides to tame the new horse and in the course of doing so, he is thrown from the horse and breaks his leg. His neighbor's say, "Oh, bad luck!" He says, "Maybe." Then a war begins and all eligible young men are taken off to fight in the war. His son is not taken because he has a broken leg. The neighbors say, "Oh, good luck!"...anyway, it goes on like this,  what looks good can be bad and vice versa. Or perhaps it is false to separate into good and bad because everything is intimately related and thus neither good or bad (or both).

Anyway, I say this because I really can't tell how it is going.

Community Projects - a trial baloon

I have three groups of five students working with community organizations on three separate projects. Two groups are working with the food bank in Oceano. One of these groups is looking for ways to help them become more efficient. The other is helping to design a brand new facility that might serve as the first iteration in the process of developing a new food bank. The third student team is working with a grass roots community group to develop a supply chain distribution system for gleaning in the county. The two groups that are working with the food bank are moving ahead beautifully. The director of the food bank, Rob, has embraced the students and they have all spent many hours already helping sort food and talking with the volunteers. During our weekly team meetings, the students repeatedly tell me the value they see in actually doing the work. They also really enjoy the senior volunteers. The two food bank projects couldn’t be going better. The Gleaning project is another thing altogether. There isn’t anyone in charge in the traditional sense. There is no individual to ask questions of, but a whole cadre of people who have been thinking about this for a while. The students feel overwhelmed with the amount of work that seems to be needed. In addition, the students are constantly worried that the project wont fulfill the requirements of the class. This project is a bit unusual, but the students are learning much. I do want to make sure I am covering the learning objectives of the course, but beyond those, the learning can be of many types. I am seeing how changing the traditional form of the project makes students nervous. It is funny how expectations influence our perceptions.

the tiny oases in the valley of doubt

This is roughly week 4 of my experiment with Trevor on coaching students through a junior-level, largely self-directed learning experience. The course is organized around a single project for improvement on a biomedical device and represents 50% of students course-load, meeting 12 hours per week, and 100% of their materials engineering education for this quarter. There was an institutional conflict this quarter, so that we are only meeting 9 hours per week, 3 hours are "on their own."

We almost entirely stopped lecturing. We do take course time to collectively check in, explain procedures or points of confusion. For the most part, 12 teams of 4-5 students are autonomously pursuing design improvement projects of their own interest. Each individual has the responsibility of learning the posted foundational content on non-crystalline materials and structural materials.

This is the point in the quarter where I usually fear that students are not learning enough.

Metaphor

I am wondering about the metaphor of your teaching. What is the fundamental frame or metaphor of your teaching? Thinking this way is based on a split in linguistics from the syntactic model in Chomsky to a semantic model developed by Lakoff and others.

As an example Lakoff analyzes the fundamental metaphors of the 'conservative' and 'progressive' political landscape. In this he distinguishes between a 'strict father' model (conservative) and a 'family nurturing' model (progressive). He has written a couple of books on this (that include reflection on the deeper structures of brain activity involved in animating such metaphors). There is also an historian and sinologist (Edward Slingerland) who has used this sort of method to explore non-action. He does an analysis of the basic metaphors of self when considering action and non-action.

The method of 'public humiliation' seems to me an expression of some particular frame. Certainly it seems to involve not only an assertion of objective reference to 'right' and 'wrong', but also how to procedurally go about teaching that. So I am wondering, what is your basic frame or metaphor for teaching?